I stumbled upon the following 29 July 2019 post with photos on the Danang & Hoi An Foreign Expats Facebook group, of which I’m a lurking member: I wouldn’t be swimming anywhere near Apocalypse Now Beach Club in the next few days. Huge outpouring of sewage into the ocean. – AM
Below are some of the more pointed (and slightly edited) comments by both expats and Vietnamese:
PTA: I’m a local here and stopped swimming 2-3 years ago. 😦 It is a bad thing when you live on the beach, you can’t swim.
BP: Local Govt needs to fix all sewage flowing into ocean and collecting all rubbish on the beach and floating offshore everyday and make the beach and water as nice as they advertise which in reality is exactly the opposite.
RMM: That drainage channel was fully extended to the sea by steam shovel this morning. They must have known that the rain was coming.
AM: You should have seen the paragliding guys running for their life. The sewage came so fast and just engulfed the whole area.
VK: Show this to the tourist, they wont pay a penny on that hotel again.
TR: How to kill tourism in one easy step. This has been going on for years… Who the hell would want to spend their hard earned money on a place like this?
WC: And you wonder why tourists don’t come back to VN?!?
This issue has reared its ugly head in other locations in Viet Nam, including Nha Trang. Last fall, sewage was being discharged directly into Nha Trang Bay, the result of an overloaded local pumping station.
Over the past 10-15 years, billions of dollars have been invested in resorts up and down Viet Nam’s long and scenic coastline. Tourism is a significant source of revenue for the country and tourists continue to flock to Viet Nam in record numbers. 2018 revenue was estimated at $26.5 billion, 11% of the country’s nominal GDP. Last year, 15.6 million tourists visited Viet Nam, up from 2.1 million in 2000. That’s a 638% increase in 18 years. In addition, there were 80 million domestic tourists, an increase of 6.8 million over 2017, according to the Vietnam National Administration of Tourism.
Here’s the bottom line, quite literally: If the county, at the local, provincial, and national level, does not solve the pollution problem, word will (continue to) spread that the beaches are dirty and the water is polluted, which means tourists will begin to look elsewhere for a quality vacation. Hotel occupancy rates will plummet and restaurants and other ancillary business will see fewer customers.
Think of reputation as a container ship reversing direction on the high seas. It will take an exceedingly long time to persuade tourists from all over the world that the beaches and the water are once again clean, not to mention actually making that idyllic scenario a reality.
To further complicate matters, many foreigners who visit Viet Nam don’t return. I’ve seen estimates that range from 70% to 90%. Environmental pollution will give newcomers yet another reason to follow suit. The short-sighted obsession with short-term profit has to stop. Unless something is done very soon, the tourism party is going to be over for Viet Nam. Change should come for the sake of the environment and all of us who share it. If it comes because of the prospect of plummeting revenue, I’ll take it. Same end result, a cleaner environment.
Full disclosure: I do not swim in the sea in Danang, Nha Trang, and other well-known resort cities. Now you know why. I know too much. While ignorance is not bliss, the truth can sometimes be painful and sad.
A Vietnamese version of the article below appeared on 6 August in the Voices section of Zing.vn, a major media outlet in Viet Nam. This is the unabridged English version with photos.
Stores that sell guns and related items are common in many US states. Photo by Mark Ashwill
Unless you’ve been offline or haven’t picked up a newspaper for a few days, you’re probably aware that history in the United States has once again repeated itself with two consecutive mass shootings. On 3 August, a gunman murdered 22 people and injured 26 at a shopping center in El Paso, TX in what is being handled as a domestic terrorist case. The following day 9 people were killed and 27 injured in a shooting in Dayton, OH.
As of 4 August, there have been 253 mass shootings in 2019 resulting in 1,047 people in 35 states being shot. Of those people, 280 died. (A mass shooting is generally defined as 3-4+ people shot in one incident, excluding the perpetrators, at roughly the same time, excluding organized crime, as well as gang- and drug-related shootings.) This works out to about 1.17 shootings per day. They have become so common that many involving fewer casualties are not reported in the national or international media. Another day, another mass shooting, as if it’s become the new normal in US society.
Gun Ownership as a Constitutionally Protected Right
While it’s difficult, if not impossible, for most non-US Americans to fathom much less to imagine, the right to own guns, including those designed with the express purpose of killing human beings, is enshrined in the US Constitution. The oft-quoted 2nd Amendment states that “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
Keep in mind that was in the late 1700s when there about 4 million non-native people living in the US with no police or army and no grocery stores. In other words, the weapons of the day, primitive as they were by modern comparison, were necessary for self-defense and hunting. There was sporadic conflict between Native American tribes and European settlers. Slavery was legal (until 1863) so the right to bear arms also meant that slave owners, who included a number of Founding Fathers, could defend themselves against those slaves who wanted their freedom and were willing to spill the blood of their white masters to obtain it.
The US Constitution was ratified 231 years ago at a time when common guns included muskets and flintlock pistols. A typical musket had a one-round magazine capacity, could fire about three rounds per minute, at best, and had a range of 50 meters. Fast forward to the present. A-15 semi-automatic rifles have a magazine capacity of 30 rounds, can fire 45 rounds per minute, and have a range of 550 meters.
Guns, Death, & Profit
The United States’ love affair with guns is so passionate that the country has 20% more guns than people at 393 million. Owning guns is not only a constitutional right that was granted in a very different time and place, but also an extremely lucrative industry. In 2016, the gun industry contributed about $51.3 billion, both directly and indirectly, to the US economy. (That’s a staggering 21% of Viet Nam’s 2018 nominal GDP.)
With so many guns floating around, it’s not surprising that the USA is #1 in this unenviable category: gun-related death rates among high-income countries. In 2017, nearly 40,000 US Americans were killed in shootings, 60% of which were suicides.
The US was one of six countries that contributed to half of the world’s gun-related deaths in 2016. It ranked 2nd to Brazil (43,200), followed by Mexico (15,400), Venezuela (13,300), Colombia (12,800), and Guatemala (5,090).
To put this in historical perspective, there were slightly fewer US casualties on D-Day (2,811 deaths and 13,564 wounded) as part of the Allied invasion of Normandy 75 years ago this month, than the total number of casualties from shooting incidents through June 6, 2019. This includes the a mass shooting in Virginia in which 13 souls perished, including the gunman, and one on 16 June in Pennsylvania in which seven people were injured and one killed.
The high level of gun violence is one of the reasons why the US ranked 36th among 163 countries, according to the latest Global Peace Index (GPI). (Note: Countries are ranked in descending order from most to least dangerous countries. Afghanistan is #1 and Iceland is #163.) The index, produced by the Institute for Economics & Peace (IEP), measures global peace using three broad themes: the level of safety and security in society, the extent of domestic and international conflict, and the degree of militarization. Viet Nam (1877) ranks 107th, while Australia (1419), Canada (1327), the UK (1801) & the USA (2401) rank 151, 158 & 119, & 36, respectively.
Citizens Armed to the Teeth
The day after I drove by the store pictured above during a recent trip to the US, I encountered the scene below in a big-box store. (MAA: Yes, the same kind of store where the El Paso shooting occurred.) My initial reaction, one of someone who lives in a country in which only the police and military have handguns, was “Maybe he’s a policeman,” but then I thought, code-switching to my US cultural mindset, “Maybe this is an open carry state.” I later asked a cashier that question. Her answer was a blank stare and shrug of the shoulders. The short answer is It is. In fact, you can carry a handgun anywhere – without a permit – except state and national parks, courthouses, police stations, and prisons. Why would this man need it while shopping? No doubt he wants to seem more important than he is (he certainly caught my attention but not in a good way) or is waiting for the chance to be a “hero”, if this occasion arose, in a country in which this term has been cheapened beyond recognition.
Man standing in the car oil section of a big-box store with a handgun on his right hip and what appears to be an ammunition clip on the left. Photo by Mark Ashwill
My follow-up reaction was that I had to have a picture of this wannabe tough guy because it was so surreal yet somehow so US American. My interior monologue continued at rapid-fire pace: “What if he sees me and becomes angry?” The heat he was packing, which appears to be a CZ 75, according to two cops I spoke with in both the US and Viet Nam, one of the few “that combines function with form to make an effective and eye pleasing firearm,” in the words of a Gunbackeronline review, is designed with one purpose in mind: to injure or kill human beings. “He could pull the trigger and claim that he felt threatened by me and my smartphone.” Maybe he’d beat the rap or serve a light sentence. Meanwhile, I’d be moldering in my grave having become yet another statistic in the annual slaughter that is US gun violence.
Color me old-fashioned but I prefer not to see people in my midst, who are not law enforcement officers, carrying guns. This is one of a number of symptoms of a collective insanity that has gripped the US. No sane country allows its citizens to run around with handgun in a holster, as if it’s still the Wild West. Statistics don’t lie, in this case, and there’s no way to spin the truth.
Photo courtesy of Pew Pew Tactical
Of Thoughts, Prayers, and the Status Quo
Whenever there’s a mass shooting in the US, and they come and go with tragic predictability, it’s always the same old song and dance, as if most people are following the same tired, old script. More thoughts and prayers. No solutions, no change. More funerals, more sadness, more psychological trauma. The beat goes on, waiting for the next one, a matter of when, not if. It’s as if US society is afflicted with an incurable case of societal psychosis. A country with 65 million more guns than people does not meet the definition of civilized.
Since information is power, let’s see what the open carry picture looks like. California, Florida, Illinois, New York, and South Carolina prohibit open carrying of handguns. The nation’s capital, Washington, D.C., also falls into this category. These states require a permit or license to openly carry handguns: Connecticut, Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, and Utah. Finally, these states restrict the open carrying of handguns in public places: Alabama (some private property restrictions), Missouri, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Washington.
Guns for Sale
How to obtain a handgun in my home state of Delaware? A piece of cake. Just head on over to your nearest gun store, like the one pictured above, 1) be 21 or older; 2) provide state-issued ID (e.g., driver’s license); and 3) submit to a background check, which could completed within 90 seconds.
You are not allowed to purchase a firearm if you are younger than 16, unless you are under direct supervision of an adult; have been convicted of a crime of violence including bodily injury to another, including misdemeanors, unless the misdemeanor was over 5 years ago; have been convicted of an offense involving narcotics, dangerous drugs, or controlled substances; have been committed to a mental institution or hospital for a mental disorder and do not have a certificate of rehabilitation; or were adjudicated as delinquent for conduct which would constitute a felony as an adult unless you are 25 or older.
All of this information and much more is available on a website called Pew Pew Tactical, which contains detailed information about buying, owning, and using guns. It is run by Eric Hung, an entrepreneur who gushes in the “About Us” section, “I really love my guns because…they are just fun.”
Oligarchy, Not the Will of the People
What do US Americans think of this endemic problem? According to a recent Reuters/Ipsos poll, nearly 70% want strong or moderate restrictions placed on firearms. However, only 8% were “very confident” that their elected representatives would do anything about it. This is what happens when a political system becomes an oligarchy, whereby the wealthy dictate policy and the average citizen has little influence, at least at the national level. That was the conclusion of a 2014 study by two professors from Princeton University and Northwestern University.
The National Rifle Association of America (NRA), a gun rights advocacy group founded in 1871, is a case in point. The Washington, D.C. area-based organization reported 2018 revenue of $412 million and spent a record $10.2 million lobbying lawmakers and federal agencies in 2017 and 2018.
Gun Violence in Viet Nam: A Moot Point
Viet Nam is faced with an array of pressing challenges, some of which are related to its status as a rapidly developing country. Fortunately, Vietnamese shooting other Vietnamese or themselves with a handgun and all of the medical and psychic trauma that result from gun violence are not among them.
Here’s my latest essay about Fulbright University Vietnam. Below is an excerpt from the conclusion to whet your appetite (or not).
Education is one way to heal the past, assuming it is objective, comprehensive, and truthful. FUV has yet to live up to its billing as a university with a mission grounded in the liberal arts. If it is ever to truly become an independent international university, it must jettison the US exceptionalist mindset that infuses so much of its thinking and actions at the highest levels. If not, lingering suspicions of the institution as a US Trojan horse bent on molding Viet Nam into the United States’ image will continue to simmer.
So goes the title of a recent article about international textile companies operating in Viet Nam. The first thought that always pops into my head whenever I read about rising labor costs is how much by local standards and how much is enough in terms of net profit? Why not pay your employees a living wage and stop exploiting them in the name of a fatter bottom line?
That, of course, is one of the fundamental problems with global capitalism. Low labor costs used to be a major selling point for Viet Nam. There’s nothing wrong with low labor costs by international standards if the local wage is more than enough to live on.
As the article notes, Vietnam raised its minimum wage by an average of 5.3% last January to VND 4.18 million ($181). I can assure you that $181 a month for a back-breaking job is not very much, not in 2019.
Here’s an example that illustrates just how large the profit margin is in the clothing industry. You can go to a market in Phnom Penh, Cambodia that sells Dockers pants, among many other products, and get a pair for $12, bargained down from $16. The seller probably still makes 100% profit for slacks that sell for $50 or $60 in the US. I mentioned that to a saleswoman in the men’s section of a Macy’s in the US and she just gave me a blank stare. Minus source and destination country overhead and shipping costs, that’s still a huge profit.
The silver lining in this rather dark and ominous cloud is that these greedy companies will eventually run out of countries and workers to exploit. Maybe not in my lifetime but it will happen. People over profit!
The drawing on the left was done by a child held at a what is euphemistically called “a summer camp” (detention center) in the U.S. I see a cage. The physical impediment that keeps her prisoner.
The drawing on the right was also created by a child.
Except this child’s drawing was made while being held prisoner at a Nazi concentration camp called Theresienstadt.
[This drawing and hundreds of paintings and poems created by children at Theresienstadt are part of a book called I Never Saw Another Butterfly.]
While there are absolute differences in experience – and as far as we know, no one in the US camps is being lined up and shot – their experience, how they express that emotionally in their art, is the same.
Thanks to Dori Keller for sharing these photographs.
Yes, the nightmare proposal related to US-bound international student recruitment has become a cold, stark reality. Check out this 3 June 2019 update from NAFSA: Association of International Educators or this 1 June 2019 BBC report about the collection of social media information.
The “social media” question has been added to the DS-160 form, the online application used by individuals to apply for a nonimmigrant visa, including the F-1. Applicants use a drop-down list to indicate the social media platforms they’ve used during the five years preceding their visa application, and to provide any IDs or handles they used on those platforms. (Internal censorship, anyone?)
What are the criteria, I wonder? I can guess and my guesses are probably not far off the mark, sadly. If the applicant is a card-carrying member of a terrorist organization, s/he probably wouldn’t advertise that fact on social media channels. Memo to the US government powers that be: Have you heard of the “dark web” and/or encrypted communication? Yes, some apps are good, so good, in fact, that the National Security Agency aka NSA and other intelligence agencies cannot hack them, or so I’m told by reliable IT sources.
If a visa applicant wrote somewhere that Donald Trump is an Orange POS, does that disqualify her/him from obtaining a F-1 or other nonimmigrant visa? What about students who are critical of US domestic and/or foreign policy? Same end result? What about those who don’t believe that God wanted Trump to be president? Ditto? What if I posted the meme to the left on one or more of my social media accounts? That’s a rather vast expanse of gray, my friends.
Here’s another educated guess: If I didn’t hold a US passport, I probably wouldn’t receive a nonimmigrant visa, if the busy little bureaucratic beavers took a gander at some of the gems I’ve posted on what few social media channels I use, not to mention blog posts, articles, and book chapters that I’ve written, even those that have been mildly censored. That’s what the USA has come to these days. The land of the free and the home of the brave, indeed.
Here’s a question for you, dear reader, that is not academic. Does the US government really have the technical capability to sort through and filter ALL of this information in multiple languages in a reasonably short period of time? Based on past performance, I have my doubts. (Think 9/11, for example, or the collapse of the Soviet Union, for that matter.) What about many of the Tweets from the Tweeter-in-Chief himself? If Donald Trump didn’t carry a US passport, would he survive the screening?
Perhaps more bureaucratic bark than bite? Time will tell. At any rate, one more hoop to jump through for millions of nonimmigrant visa applicants, including students, more wasted time in a life that is already fleeting, and one more reason for some international students to consider studying elsewhere.
Bonus: The following was posted in one of the Facebook groups for college counselors of which I’m a member:
If you work with international students, be prepared for this. The State Department updated both the DS-160 (non-immigrant visa application) and the DS-260 (immigrant visa application) in the last week to ask all visa applicants to provide their social media names/handles for the last 5 years. This means that even STUDENTS applying to come to the US to study will be asked to provide information for the following platforms:
That is the actual list from the application. Yes, the government requires Vine info (which doesn’t exist anymore) but not Snapchat (which is where all the kids are), but welcome to the era of “extreme vetting”. I shudder to think what impact this is going to have on students trying to come here to study.
Here’s my latest article, this time on LinkedIn. This introduction might whet your appetite for more (or not):
As one digs deeper into the national character of the Americans, one sees that they have sought the value of everything in this world only in the answer to this single question: how much money will it bring in?
-Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, 1835
This prescient observation by Alexis de Tocqueville is a reference to the US as a “nation of hustlers,” a theme that various historians and social critics, including Morris Berman and Walter McDougall, have embraced and explored in their work. Not surprisingly, this mercenary mindset has also infected the field of international education in the US, including its non-profit wing.
If a visa applicant wrote somewhere that Donald Trump is an Orange 
