Posted tagged ‘overseas study’

The Double-Edged Sword That Is US Higher Education

27/03/2013

TDT logoI was recently invited by Madame Ton Nu Thi Ninh, President of the Tri Viet Institute for International Studies and Exchange within Ton Duc Thang University and Senior Advisor to the President of TDT  University, to speak to interested students, faculty and staff about US higher education in comparative perspective with an implicit focus on Vietnam. 

As with people, every country has characteristics and features that are worthy of emulation and those that are not, especially in other countries that have very different histories, political systems, etc.  The US, including its higher education system, is no exception.  This was the theme of my presentation to over 150 members of the TDT University community.  In addition to the presentation, I participated in a brief dialogue with Mme Ninh and engaged in a lively discussion with the audience. 

To me, it seems a dreadful indignity to have a soul controlled by geography.  (George Santayana)

mark at podium2 (resized)

Making a point.

So that the audience would know where I’m coming from, figuratively speaking, I began my remarks with this description of perspective:  I carry a US passport but it doesn’t define me.  Below is an outline of my presentation, which was given in English and Vietnamese.  The “distinguishing features” included size=choice, diversity, mass education, quality, cost, transferability of credits and portability of credentials and internationalization. I concluded with some comments about US Higher Ed as a Cautionary Tale (i.e., negative role model), US Higher Ed as a Source of Inspiration (i.e., positive role model) and the implications of overseas study for Vietnam.

  • Distinguishing Features of US Higher Education
  • US Higher Ed as a Cautionary Tale (i.e., negative role model): e.g., high cost, student loan debt ($966 billion as of 12/12 with average debt of $34,703); the challenge of creating global citizens in a nation in which the majority of its citizens are nationalists, too many colleges and universities = duplication, overlap and inefficiency, unaccredited schools/rogue  providers (“The US exports some of the world’s best and worst higher education.”), etc. 
  • US Higher Ed as a Source of Inspiration (i.e., positive role model):   system of accreditation, many schools and programs that meet the needs of a variety of learners, flexibility (seamless transfer and transition), gen ed requirements and the philosophy behind them, philanthropy, private=non-profit
  • Vietnamese Students & Overseas Study:  What Does It All Mean? (i.e., implications)

Q & A

maa with mme ninh (resized)

There were some excellent questions from the audience.  One student asked how to select US graduate programs and another, who happens to follow this blog, asked me why I had removed one unaccredited US school from my list of such schools.  Answer:  because the president informed me that her “university” is no longer recruiting in Vietnam.  (The list consists of US-based rogue providers operating here.)  Yet another student asked me about my impressions of Vietnamese students:  are hard working, dedicated, have initiative, are involved in meaningful extracurricular activities, etc. 

The last question was from a young Vietnamese woman who had studied at one of America’s finest (and most expensive) universities.  It was about how US higher education offers so many opportunities for students to broaden their personal and academic horizons and how this system could be replicated in Vietnam.  Where to begin?  An entire workshop could be devoted to these issues.  The answer would involve history, starting points, extenuating circumstances, funding, policy, etc.  I’m reminded of something an expat friend who runs a high-tech company here has said on more than one occasion, and I’m paraphrasing here:  Vietnamese universities have done rather well with the resources that they have

Article & Backgrounder

Here is an article in Vietnamese that was posted on the TDT University website:  Viện liên kết và trao đổi quốc tế Trí Việt tổ chức buổi Tọa đàm chuyên đề “Tổng quan về Hệ thống giáo dục đại học Hoa Kỳ” (Tri Viet Institute for International Studies and Exchange Holds a Seminar on “An Overview of the Higher Education System of the United States”). 

If I were to select a backgrounder for this talk, this post from April 2012 would be it:  Counterpoint: A US American’s Critique of a Harvard Position Paper (and More) – Countries as Role Models:  A Double-Edged Sword (aka Yes, No, It Depends)

MAA

Study in the USA to Publish Vietnamese Language Magazine

12/02/2013

Study in the USA logoStudy in the USA ® has announced that it will publish the first-ever Vietnamese language magazine for distribution in the coming year to students and parents in Vietnam. This special pocket-size edition will feature content especially appealing to Vietnamese students, including information and articles about four-year colleges and universities, community colleges, high school completion programs, the popular 2+2 option, visa issues, intensive English programs and the US education system. It will be distributed free of charge to attendees of IIE US Higher Education Fairs, StudyUSA Higher Education Fairs and Community College Fairs in Vietnam in Fall 2013 and Spring 2014.

This will be the sixth foreign language magazine published by Study in the USA, after Japanese, Chinese, Spanish, Portuguese, and Arabic. Given that parents are the key decision-makers and that very few have a reading knowledge of English, it’s essential this information be made available in the local language.

Mag_thumb_S_2013

Study in the USA was founded in 1978 by Peggy Printz as a response to Asian friends asking how their children should choose and apply to universities in North America. It was the first publication promoting U.S. programs to international students and continues to be the leader in its field. Today, Study in the USA operates with the mission of providing helpful information about U.S. higher education to international students and to connect them with reputable programs. Ten regional magazines, including a boarding schools & summer studies issue, are published by Study in the USA each year for students and their parents. More than 300,000 copies are distributed annually in 123 countries. 

StudyUSA.com, which is an award-winning website, contains profiles of hundreds of quality American programs in fourteen languages. It features in-depth articles and current news stories about international students and the US educational system, including university admissions, scholarships and testing. It also provides online advisors who will answer admissions questions and offer personal assistance with unique situations. A company of principles, Study in the USA only accepts listings from schools, universities, institutions and programs that meet the highest standards of integrity and excellence in education and service to international students. With these practices, Study in the USA has helped millions of students find US programs.

A note to my US higher ed colleagues:  For information about advertising opportunities and a chance to contribute to this new magazine, contact Travis Drageset, Marketing & Social Media, Study in the USA at (206) 622-2075 or marketing@studyusa.com.  StudyUSA is also looking for high-quality student testimonial videos for its website. 

Disclosure: Study in the USA is a client of Capstone Vietnam, of which I’m managing director.

Study Abroad Consultant Regulations Tightened

23/01/2013

The winds of change are blowing in the regulation and oversight of education agents in Vietnam  This is the  result of recent scandals and demands from the public for closer scrutiny of education agents.  It seems that the Wild West environment in which many of these businesses have operated is going the way of the dinosaur, which is good news for students, parents and those companies that conduct their business in an ethical and transparent manner. 

3Globes

Image courtesy of University of Maine at Farmington International & Exchange Programs

According to Decision 05/2013/QD-TTg, proposed by the Minister of Education and Training (MoET) and issued by the Prime Minister on 15 January 2013, study abroad education consultancies will have to meet the following requirements effective 10 March 2013. 

1) companies must have on deposit VND 500 million ($23,800) in a commercial bank; and

2) owners and agents must have a university qualification, be proficient in at least one foreign language and be certified  by MoET

In addition, education consultancies must publicize all information about schools in foreign countries, among other requirements.  Local departments of education and training (DoET) will be responsible for implementing this decision.  

Here are links to a 18 January Việt Nam News article in English and the  Decision 05/2013/QD-TTg in Vietnamese.

Over 100,000 Vietnamese Studied Overseas in 2012

16/01/2013

Last year around this time, I wrote a post about about the 100,000+ Vietnamese students who studied in 49 countries and territories in 2011, according to the Ministry of Education and Training (MoET).  90% of them were self-financing.    I conservatively estimated the investment in overseas study to be in the $1+ billion range. 

billions of dollarsThis year’s report, released early this month, revealed that the number of Vietnamese studying overseas had increased to 106, 104 in the 2011/12 academic year.  The top host countries included the US, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, Singapore and China - not necessarily in that order.  About 35,900, 34%, studied in Asian countries, while nearly 40% were in Australia and the US.   The Ministry of Finance estimates that Vietnamese spend $10,000-$15,000 a year on average for each student, which adds up to between $1-1.6 billion. 

As Nguyen Truong Giang, a senior Ministry of Finance official, mentioned, and as those who know the Vietnamese higher education and overseas study scene can confirm, one of the driving forces behind this phenomenon is quality, or a lack thereof ,at Vietnamese high schools and universities.  This places more pressure on Vietnamese institutions to improve quality.  It also creates opportunities for new ventures, including international standard K-12 schools and foreign degree programs, often in partnership with Vietnamese universities.  This trend is evident, especially in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC). 

Follow these links to read the article on which this post is based: 

Billions of dollars outflows to fund Vietnamese students’ studies overseas

Hàng tỷ USD học phí đang chảy đi hàng năm

“Overseas study consultancy put under no control, students suffer”

21/11/2012

VietNamNet Bridge – The number of students becoming the victims of overseas study consultancy firms’ trickeries has been increasing. Meanwhile, the firms cannot be prosecuted for their swindling, because there has been no regulation on the punishments. 

This recent article, the latest in a large number that I’ve seen over the years, documents abuses perpetrated by overseas study consultancies in Vietnam, otherwise known as agents.  It’s still the Wild West for many of them, whose business practices are driven by greed and a total disregard for the people they are supposed to serve.

In most cases, the victims do not know where they should go and whom they should contact to ask for help.

 On the afternoon of October 29, a lot of parents came to Atlantic’s head office in Thu Dau Mot City of Binh Duong province to claim the tuitions back. Atlantic introduces itself as an international education and training school.

 The parents said they paid 4000-10,000 dollars worth for consultancy fees and the procedures for their children’s overseas study. The problem is that the money was paid one year ago, but their children have not received any information about the overseas study.

 On VietAbroader.org, a forum of the Vietnamese students in the US, a member wrote that he followed the procedures for overseas study via a consultancy firm headquartered on Le Van Sy Street in HCM City.

The firm’s leaflet says that every student has to pay 300 dollars for preparing documents and translation services, and that the procedures would be fulfilled after three months.

However, in fact, when signing contracts with the firm, clients were asked to pay a series of other kinds of fees, including the 250 dollars for the translation and communication fee, 700 dollars for remittance service, 400 dollars for other kinds of fees. In order to get visas, they would have to pay another 1000 dollars.

 However, the member of the forum did not get visa. The firm then asked him to pay 6000 dollars more, ensuring that he would get visa soon, but the promise did not come true. After a lot of negotiations, he has claimed 7000 dollars back, while the remaining money has not been refunded, because he could not show the invoices to prove the payment.

The two key points are: 1) In most cases, the victims do not know where they should go and whom they should contact to ask for help; and 2) “the firms cannot be prosecuted for their swindling because there has been no regulation on the punishments.”  Simply put, the system is lacking in checks, balances and accountability.  Many people refuse to suffer silently and will find an outlet, usually online (e.g., VietAbroader.org and the media) and within their personal networks, to voice their complaints.  Media coverage of cheating and fraud is helpful but its impact limited.  What’s needed is a clearinghouse to log all of these complaints and a government office that will act on them.

Parents are desperate to work with companies that treat them and their children with fairness and respect.  They are looking for quality, value and transparency.  This rising tide of expectations, along with official follow-up and punishment, when necessary, will ultimately put the “bad apples” out of business.  One of the values of  my company is integrity:  We adhere to the highest ethical standards in every dimension of our work and believe that transparency is not just the right thing to do but good business.   That pretty much sums it up, IMO.

MAA

P.S.:  Maybe it’s time to create an association whose members consist of companies that pledge to adhere to a strict “client’s bill of rights.”  In a culture in which corruption is rampant, chasing after money the order of the day and cutting corners business as usual, it would be a very select group indeed.

In Celebration of International Education Week (IEW)

14/11/2012

Given the focus of this blog, I thought it was only fitting that I devote a few posts to International Education Week (IEW), “an opportunity to celebrate the benefits of international education and exchange worldwide. This joint initiative of the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of Education is part of our efforts to promote programs that prepare Americans for a global environment and attract future leaders from abroad to study, learn, and exchange experiences in the United States.” 

To kick off the week was a post entitled Vietnam Retains 8th Place Ranking Among Sending Countries based on the 2012 Open Doors Report on International Educational Exchange, released by the Institute of International Education (IIE). 

There will be another post about Vietnam as one of the top four emerging markets for international student recruitment, based on a recent World Education Services (WES) report and, possibly, one about US students visas in Vietnam (The US Student Visa: It’s Not Rocket Science!).  I will probably close out the week’s celebration with some reflections on three years of blogging about issues near and dear to my heart and mind. 

MAA

“Corruption in Education Creates Serious Consequences for the Poor”

22/10/2012

This the title is a wide-ranging interview that I did last month with a reporter from Báo Giáo dục Việt Nam (Vietnam Education News).  This education news website ranks 8,829 in the world, 51 in Vietnam and is linked in 2,093 websites (as of 20.10.12).  As you can see from some original English language excerpts below, corruption in education is just one of a number of points that I touched on.  Vietnamese title:  Tham nhũng trong giáo dục gây hậu quả nghiêm trọng với người nghèo.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Dr. Mark Ashwill is Managing Director of Capstone Vietnam, a human resource development company based in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City. From 2005-2009, he was country director of the Institute of International Education (IIE) in Vietnam.  In areas related to “Disappointments and Expectations in Education in Vietnam,” Dr. Ashwill shared a lot of valuable experiences about how the Vietnamese education system can integrate with the world’s most advanced education systems.

1.  Dr. Ashwill, who has lived in Vietnam for a long time and knows a lot about education in Vietnam, and is currently working on the development of human resources as well as serving as a bridge to America for many young people, commented on the advantages and disadvantages of education in Vietnam.

Some of the advantages include the cultural value that people place on education, the amount of money and time that parents invest in their children’s education, and the strong work ethic and desire on the part of most young people to fulfill their potential through education and related activities.

Some disadvantages include underpaid and overworked teachers and professors, substandard facilities, including libraries, an outdated university entrance exam and the rapid privatization of higher education that has, in many cases, been high profit but low quality in nature.

2.According to you, what does Vietnam need to do to break out of the current situation? 

Vietnam needs to continue targeting high-priority areas, including paying K-12 teachers and professors a decent wage. In a recent survey conducted by the Vietnam Institute of Educational Sciences (VIES), 526 primary, secondary and high school teachers from 27 schools in five provinces were asked this simple question: Would you still choose to work as a teacher, if you could make the decision again? Sadly but not surprisingly, 40.9% of primary, 59% of secondary and 52.4% of high school teachers said “no.” In order to recruit outstanding teachers to educate and train young people and prepare them for a rapidly changing society and world of work, salaries, benefits, and working conditions need to be attractive and competitive.

Another issue, one to which the media have devoted a lot of ink and megabytes, is corruption in education. As your readers know, the list of examples of corruption in education is a long one. A Transparency International report published several years ago entitled Stealing the Future: Corruption in Education, listed six (6) damaging effects of corruption in education. In my opinion, these three are the most corrosive:

1. If children come to believe that personal effort and merit do not count and that success comes through manipulation, favoritism, and bribery, then the very foundations of society are shaken.

2. Corruption in education affects more people than corruption in others sectors, both in rural and urban areas.

3. Its consequences are particularly harsh for the poor who, without access to education or with no alternative but low-quality education, have little chance to escape a life of poverty.

Without a workable system of accountability (i.e,. checks and balances), this trend is likely to continue indefinitely. Vietnam’s growth will be stunted if this corruption is not addressed on a systematic basis.

3. According to you, what are the conditions for successful education reform in Vietnam?

Some problems can be solved with additional money (e.g., teacher salaries, infrastructure improvement, etc.), while others can be addressed with policy changes and effective implementation. Given how much value Vietnamese place on education and the fact that these reforms have to be carried out by the government, it becomes a question of political will, commitment and follow-through. 

4.In the 2010/11 academic year, 14,888 students from Vietnam were studying in the United States (up 14% from the previous year). Vietnam is the eighth leading place of origin for students going to the United States.  Do you know why US education system is so attractive to Vietnamese students? 

When you look at the top ten countries sending their young people to study in the U.S., Vietnam really stands out. It ranks 8th in the number of students it has studying at American high schools, colleges and universities but 43rd in GDP. (The closest country is Saudi Arabia at 24th.) What this means is that Vietnamese are investing extraordinary sums of money in overseas education in proportion to GDP. Last year, there were over 100,000 Vietnamese studying abroad, according to the Ministry of Education and Training (MoET), 90% of whom were self-financing.

Why the US? Because of the well-deserved reputation of its higher education system for quality, choice, flexibility and diversity. It really is unique in the numbers of institutions from which students have to choose, the options are their disposal (e.g., 60% of all Vietnamese in the U.S. begin their studies at a community college before transferring to a four-year school to complete their bachelor’s degree). Vietnamese and other international students can even join high school completion programs that enable them to earn a high school diploma and associate’s degree (the first two years of undergraduate education) at community colleges, mostly in Washington state.

While US higher education is very expensive, there are ways to lower the cost, including attending public and private institutions that offer scholarships and financial aid, and attending a community college for the first two years.

5. What should Vietnamese education do to intergate with other educational systems?  

I think Vietnam is doing exactly what it should be doing:

  • Actively learning about other education systems in the tradition of comparative education and seeing what it can adapt and use at home and what is not relevant and applicable. A point I’ve made repeatedly over the years in my discussions with Vietnamese, Americans and others is that foreign countries are negative and positive role models, sources of inspiration, as well as cautionary tales.
  • Focusing on the all-important issue of learner protection to make sure that only accredited foreign educational institutions are permitted to partner with Vietnamese universities and operate in Vietnam. (Unfortunately, most of the unaccredited institutions of higher education that have entered the market here are based in the U.S.)
  • Reaching out to officially accredited foreign educational partners to develop mutually beneficial relationships that involve teaching, research, university-industry cooperation and service.

More Studying Overseas; US Continues to Lose International Student Market Share

18/10/2012

According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s annual Education at a Glance report,there were 4.12 million students enrolled in a higher education program outside of their country of citizenship in 2010.  (The information was collected from 34 OECD member countries, in addition to other non-member G-20 countries: Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Russia, Saudi Arabia and South Africa.)  International students comprised 2.3% of all tertiary students vs. 2.1% in 2000.

Below are some more relevant statistics:

  • A total of 177 million students were attending a postsecondary institution in their home countries or abroad, an increase of 7% over 2009.
  •  In 1975, when the first Education at a Glance report was published, there were only 800,000 students studying overseas.
  •  52.5% were from an Asian country, with China (17%), India (5.9%) and Korea (3.7%) the three largest sources of internationally mobile students.

Contributing Factors to the Continued Growth of International Academic Mobility

As the report notes, “A significant portion of students coming from G20 non-OECD countries includes the better-performing students, natural candidates for public or private support, or students who have a relatively high socio-economic background. This implies that student mobility cannot only bring stature to tertiary institutions’ academic programs, but also economic benefits to the host country’s education systems.

“In the current economic context, shrinking support for scholarships and grants to support student mobility – as well as tightening budgets among individuals – may diminish the pace of student mobility. On the other hand, limited labor market opportunities in students’ countries of origin may lower the opportunity costs of studying abroad, and help increase student mobility.”

As a September 2012 World Education Services (WES) article entitled International Academic Mobility Continues to Grow Despite Economic Downturn, points out, “countries and institutions are hungry for the influx of capital and innovation that skilled students bring, and as such are doing everything they can to attract them. Seizing upon the currently unchecked demand for cross-border education, countries and institutions are implementing specific and coordinated efforts to promote themselves to international students. National immigration policies are also playing a role. While some national policy choices have, or are, restricting student flow to certain countries, the emergent trend appears to be towards incentivizing foreign students, whether through easier visa procedures, more generous access to the labor market, or post-graduation residency options.”  The US is also moving in this direction under President Obama, albeit at a glacial pace.

Top Receiving Countries

Developed countries hosted 83% of all international students (77% in an OECD country).  The U.S. remains the leading host but continues to lose market share, which has decreased from 23% in 2000 to 16.6% in 2009.  The UK is number two with 13% of total international enrollment, followed by Australia at 6.6%, Germany at 6.4% and France at 6.3%.

Vietnam

According to the Vietnam Ministry of Education and Training (MoET), there were over 100,000 young Vietnamese studying at institutions in 49 countries and territories in 2011, 90% of whom were self-financing.  The top five receiving countries were…

  • Australia (25,000)
  • United States (14,888)
  • China (12,500)
  • Singapore (7,000)
  • UK (6,000)

Rounding out the top ten are France (5,540), Russia (5,000), Germany (3,870), Japan (3,500)/Canada (3,500) and South Korea (3,000).

With a domestic college and university enrollment of 1.9 million, this means that 5% of all Vietnamese students enrolled in a postsecondary institution are studying overseas.  With an 8th place ranking among all sending countries, Vietnam remains a bright spot for US higher education in terms of both quantity and quality of students.

Top Ten Sending Countries & GDP: Vietnam’s Story

12/06/2012

Below is a PPT slide that I used in a recent presentation at the NAFSA annual conference in Houston, TX entitled Beyond Education Agents:  An Introduction to Diversifying International Student Recruitment Strategy.  The slide presents a comparison of the top ten sending countries, according to the latest (March 2012) quarterly update from the US Department of Homeland Security, their 2011 GDP and their ranking in that category.  (SEVIS data include students enrolled at all levels.)  Given Vietnam’s recent history (e.g., war, poverty, isolation), the fact that it ranks 8th among all countries sending students to the US is an extraordinary achievement. 

 

As you can see, Vietnam jumps off of the screen with a GDP of $299 billion and a world ranking of 43rd, making it by far the poorest country among its peers.  These statistics reveal the following:

  1. the cultural value of education;
  2. the importance of making significant investments in education both in Vietnam and abroad;
  3. the disproportionate amount of income that Vietnamese parents spend on their children’s education; and
  4. the positive prospects for continued growth. 

MAA

Should the U.S. State Department Copy the British Council?

31/03/2012

 

The British Council, as an education provider, a research analyst, and a conference convener is an interesting model. At the very least, taking a look at the British Council makes me wonder why the United States government does not pull back and take a big-picture look at what it might do to provide better global support for U.S. universities.

This is the title of a 14 March 2012 piece by David Wheeler of The Chronicle of Higher Education (CHE). I have often asked myself this question, having worked for a quasi-US governmental organization that once had a contract for EducationUSA activities in Vietnam, among other countries.  (Some US diplomats I’ve known over the years have asked themselves the same question.) 

The fact that the ”United States government does not pull back and take a big-picture look at what it might do to provide better global support for U.S. universities” has resulted in the absence of a comprehensive national export strategy for education, a sure-fire recipe for disorganization, conflicting signals and piecemeal policy-making.  The relevant Cabinet-level departments not only do not cooperate but some colleagues in those departments don’t even talk to each other. 

The inability of the US government to present a united front and speak with one voice about all matters related to the promotion of American higher education around the world reflects a lack of vision and leadership at the highest levels.  In a sense, the US is resting on its laurels as the world around it changes, and other countries aggressively and persistently chip away at its international student market share. 

What about EducationUSA, you may ask?  This public affairs activity is constrained by its limited mission, a lack of funding, inadequate staffing, a lack of consistency and coordination, the gaping chasm between rhetoric and reality across countries (i.e., U.S. diplomatic missions) and its steadfast refusal to constructively engage a select group of education consultants.  In a phrase  “it is what it is.” 

The answer to the question posed by the CHE article?  A qualified “yes.”  Not copy but certainly be inspired by and devise ways to adapt this model in a strategic and productive manner. 

MAA


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 63 other followers