Archive for April 2011

Study Mississippi

28/04/2011

Study Mississippi is the a latest in a series of state higher education consortia created to promote higher education in a particular state to international students.  I discussed this trend in two previous posts, including State Int’l Education Consortia: Strength in Unity (6.12.09) and Vietnam: Attracting Foreign Students to Maine (1.11.10). 

Other states in whose footsteps Mississippi is following are California, Iowa, Indiana, Maine, Oregon, Washington, Wisconsin and Texas. 

According to the website, Study Mississippi describes itself as a “consortium of accredited educational institutions in the U.S. State of Mississippi whose purpose is to connect international students and professionals with quality Mississippi education and training. Members include high schools, community colleges, public and private colleges and universities, and professional English language schools.”

Continuing on the theme of “strength in unity,” this is a potentially effective approach to branding higher education in Mississippi and other states.   The extent to which “potential” becomes “actual” depends upon the quality of the website and related materials and the level of inter-institutional cooperation, as well as marketing and promotion efforts in Vietnam and other high-priority countries. 

In the Name of the Father, Son & Holy Spirit: Saving Souls Through English Teaching in Vietnam

21/04/2011

Why do foreigners come to Vietnam to work for the long-term?  Why do they leave their families, friends, jobs, the comforts of home in an “advanced” (i.e., wealthy) nation for life in a (poor) developing country?  Money, adventure, penance, reconciliation, professional opportunity, a chance to contribute to Vietnam’s development, love (“home is where the heart is”) and religion, among others.  For many, however, the main reason is to make “them” (the Vietnamese) more like “us.”  To find out who “us” is complete the following fill-in-the-blank exercise:   INSERT THE NAME of a country that has occupied Vietnam and waged war on its people, flora, fauna, and cultural treasures.   

In the past they have come in the name of Profit, Civilization, King/Queen, Aggression and Religion.  They are still coming to make money in Vietnam’s burgeoning “free market with socialist orientation” (emphasis on the free market) and to “lead people to Christ, disciple leaders, and then one day send some back to be missionaries in their home countries.” 

How do they accomplish the latter goal in a country that has historically justifiable reasons to be suspicious of outside influences, especially those related to politics and religion?  Easy – they either don’t mention it or they gloss over it.  It’s the Trojan horse approach to making “them” more like “us,” taking to heart Christ’s call to “make disciples of all nations.” 

It’s not enough to live a life of service and follow the basic tenets of their religion with its inherent commitment to social and economic justice, peace, forgiveness and love.  They feel “called” to become clandestine missionaries – sheep in wolf’s clothing in a manner of speaking – and go out into the world to convert the heathen to Christianity so that they, too, may be saved, belong to Jesus and have eternal life. 

In the 17th century it was the Jesuit missionaries, the main reason why there are 6-7 million Catholics in Vietnam today.  Now, it’s expat English teachers and other professionals who claim to have a monopoly on the truth and who offer goodies that Vietnam desperately needs.  Vietnam – with the need for English proficiency and 60% of the population under the age of 30 – is seen as fertile ground for this kind of low-key, backdoor proselytizing. 

English Teaching Sans Jesus

For those interested in teaching English for a secular organization or company, check out this 2010 article that appeared in Transitions Abroad magazine.  You can benefit from a meaningful cross-cultural experience, help your students learn and improve their English language skills and make some money at the same time – all without trying to swell the ranks of evangelical Christians, deplete the ranks of Buddhists and impose Western culture on the Vietnamese. 

Consider this part 1 in a two part series.  Stay tuned…

The Fourth Education Conference

19/04/2011

I recently joined several hundred other attendees at the 4th Education Conference on 9 April in Hanoi, organized by the US Embassy, the Vietnam Education Foundation (VEF), the Vietnam Ministry of Education and Training (MoET) and National Economics University (NEU).  Sponsors included the Henry Luce Foundation, the Vietnam Center at Texas Tech University, Johnson & Johnson, USAID, Pepsico, Citibank and Intel.

These conferences, each with a somewhat different emphasis, were initiated in 2008 by Ambassador Michael Michalak. (Look under Documents for links to the conference reports from January 2008-10.) 

This year’s conference, entitled Strengthening US-Vietnam Higher Education Ties, included a group of US higher education colleagues who were participants in the US Department of Commerce’s first ever education trade mission to Indonesia and Vietnam. For information, check out this Chronicle of Higher Education article from 3 April entitled Commerce Dept. Takes Greater Role in Promoting U.S. Higher Education Overseas (PDF download) and a commentary entitled No Better Export: Higher Education by Francisco Sánchez, under secretary for international trade at the U.S. Commerce Department, who accompanied the group.

Feedback

I asked a number of attendees, including presenters and moderators, how they felt about the conference. The consensus seemed to be that it was not as engaging as previous conferences and that there was too much rehashing, a paucity of new ideas and a lack of information-sharing about new and exciting projects. It might be helpful to provide the presenters with detailed guidelines and to ask the moderators to provide “their” presenters with advice and guidance regarding their presentations. One presenter told me that he “felt that the organization of my particular session was fairly haphazard, with little direction, and it would be great if we could actually get something meaningful out of the discussions and presentations next year.”

Some others had this to say:  

  • the same stuff over and over again…
  • I sensed more head hunting for students and action than true forming of relationships
  • what is it that we can relocate that is so special?
  • what’s being done at a German or US or whatever university located in VN that could not, if there were the will, be done in a VN institution?
  • a good place to meet friends – networking probably the biggest role
  • hopefully, someday they will think about the format and try to find something productive
  • I sensed a lot of presenters dusted off off what they had on their desktop, changed the title to try to make it fit into the session subject and gave that presentation
  • needs more lead time and invite people who really have something to say

Food for thought in 2012, assuming there will be a 5th education conference.

There were also some Americans who relish the role of cultural missionary and never seem to tire of lecturing the Vietnamese on what they should do to improve their higher education system.  

One of the more interesting  presentations was the keynote speech entitled Five Observations About American Higher Education and Their Implications for Vietnam (PDF download) delivered by Kathryn Mohrman, Director, University Design Consortium and Professor, School of Public Affairs, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona USA.  The observations were:

  1. American higher education is a combination of English and German models
  2. U.S. colleges and universities have unique ideals for undergraduate education
  3. American higher education has strong links to society
  4. American colleges and universities are becoming increasingly interdisciplinary
  5. U.S. colleges and universities have significant autonomy

It might also have been useful to include some observations about US higher education as a negative role model – learn from its mistakes and shortcomings.

One of the more informative and relevant presentations was Cultivating Leaders for the Vietnamese Private Sector: A Case Study from the University of Hawaii’s Vietnam Executive MBA Program in HCMC (PDF download) by Lillian Forsyth.

Postscript (20.4.11):  The Fourth Education Conference Evaluation was sent out to all participants today.

Frederick Taylor University & Vietnam

13/04/2011

A student in the northern port city of Haiphong recently emailed me about Frederick Taylor University (FTU), which is on my list of 25 US-based or affiliated unaccredited schools operating in Vietnam, 13 of which are in the rogue provider haven (heaven?) of California, where they can easily obtain “state approval.”  She wrote: 

I am writing to ask for your help about Frederick Taylor University. This summer, I intend to take an America MBA course in Haiphong because I can not study in Hanoi. Some of my friends suggest Frederick Taylor University. However, there are some controversies about whether this university is worth studying or not. Could you please give me some advice and suggest some American universities in Haiphong? 

The answer to her question was easy.  Don’t waste your time or money.  Like many other unaccredited schools, its “campus” is in an office building.  Its website notes that “Since its founding in 1994 as a premier institution of higher learning, Frederick Taylor University has provided undergraduate and graduate degrees as well as advanced certificates courses in business administration and management.”  Given the low overhead and high demand, the profit is substantial. 

One of FTU’s local partners is SARA Group, which works with partners in cities like Haiphong. 

FTU Q & A

Below are some of my questions and the answers:   

Who is FTU working with in Haiphong?  …a vocational centre of Haiphong Labor Union is working with SARA Group and this group offers FTU MBA course.

How are the courses taught and in which language? The courses are taught online and in English.

How long does it take to earn the degree? 14 – 16 months

What is the cost of the program?  $4,400

How many people do you know who are studying with FTU? I am not sure; however, the number is not small.

FTU and the Vietnam Ministry of Education and Training (MoET)

Is this arrangement legal?  No, which means this operation will be closed down and six figures worth of revenue will simply vanish into thin air.  A minor victory in this never-ending battle.  Will FTU continue offering “degree programs” elsewhere in Vietnam?  Probably.  It’s like those magic birthday candles.  You blow one out and it reignites.  Most rogue providers have more lives than a cat. 

What this illustrates is the need for high-quality and affordable degree programs offered by regionally accredited US colleges and universities in Vietnam.  Vietnam is doing its part to pull the plug on these types of programs; the US should do the same – a two-pronged attack to the benefit of students and legitimate US higher education.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 64 other followers