
Ambassador Michalak and EducationUSA Adviser Nguyen Huyen cut the ribbon. Photo Courtesy of U.S. Embassy
I was pleased to see Ambassador Michael Michalak talk at considerable length about accreditation at a recent ribbon cutting ceremony for the Embassy’s new EducationUSA advising office. In fact, over half of his speech focused on this important topic.
When I was IIE-Vietnam country director from 2005-09, this was one of my “signature issues,” and I worked closely with the Public Affairs and Commercial Service sections of the Embassy and Consulate General, each with a somewhat different interest.
The U.S. Mission (Hanoi & HCMC) receives a steady stream of requests to meet with U.S. higher education colleagues and send staff to various events, including graduation ceremonies. The question is always this: is the institution making the request accredited? If not, having an official U.S. government representative present has some potentially nasty public relations implications. The U.S. State Department’s official position is that it works only with officially accredited U.S. colleges and universities.
The timing of Ambassador Michalak’s comments is not coincidental. In July and August, the Vietnamese media devoted large quantities of ink and countless megabytes to the issue of unaccredited schools operating in Vietnam, most of which are based in the U.S. As I mentioned in a June 2010 post entitled Get a Ph.D. in America Without Knowing English! …
This issue is a quietly ticking time bomb that will explode not all at once but over an extended period of time, slowly, insidiously, invisibly for the most part but nevertheless destructively. The cumulative effect of “US higher education institutions” cheating students and parents will tarnish the luster and damage the reputation… of accredited US colleges and universities. Thus, we will be doing ourselves and foreign countries a favor by taking the issue of learner protection seriously and taking the necessary steps to rein in, or at least expose, unaccredited schools.
It is an issue that should also concern the US State Department because part of its work is directly related to public diplomacy and the United States’ image in the eyes of the Vietnamese and people of other nationalities.
In referring to why there are so many Vietnamese and other international students studying in the U.S. (i.e., quality and “a decentralized system of quality assurance called accreditation”), the Ambassador noted understatedly, “I know this is a topic of some concern here in Vietnam and I want to explain to you what this system is in the U.S….” After providing an overview of the system of accreditation, including some history, he offered the following advice:
Just like institutions that are considering partnering with a U.S. school, prospective students must also undertake due diligence by carefully investigating the school they plan to attend and determine if it meets the level of academic standard they expect. Similarly, Vietnamese institutions wishing to partner with a U.S. school should also conduct thorough research and determine if they seek to base the partnership on strong academic standards. The first and most important step in determining a school’s legitimacy and quality is to check whether an institution is accredited by a “recognized” body or bodies. To do this, visit the websites of the U.S. Department of Education and the Council for Higher Education Accreditation. You may also reference the U.S. Embassy’s “Accreditation Resources” website which includes specific questions that should be asked in assessing an institution.
The Embassy also has an interest in facilitating broader and deeper relationships between U.S. universities and Vietnamese universities. Again, accreditation status is the starting point in all of these discussions. If a U.S. school does not have accreditation or an active plan to become accredited, we will not support that school’s efforts to establish relationships with foreign schools because they have not made the effort to show they meet certain quality standards. At the same time, we would encourage Vietnamese institutions to continue to support joint programs with accredited U.S. schools as these can provide many of the benefits of a U.S. education while never having to leave Vietnam.
The last comment is especially striking. Indeed, to my knowledge, it’s the first time the U.S. Mission in Vietnam has taken a public stance on this issue, and I applaud the Ambassador for drawing more attention to it. Also a first: both the Embassy and the Consulate General have a section entitled Accreditation Resources in English and Vietnamese (Kiểm định Chất lượng các trường Đại học Hoa Kỳ). As of today (20 September), it took the third slot in the In the Spotlight section of the homepage, sandwiched between President Obama’s Address on the End of the Combat Mission in Iraq and Jan. 2010 Education Conference Report .











Buyer Beware: The Potential Pitfalls of Agency-Based Recruitment
25/09/2010“Some parents may choose to work through an agent when looking to find the appropriate school for their child in America. Agents are local representatives for a school or group of schools who are compensated for their services, either by you as the client or by the school for which they represent, or both. For those parents who are considering working with an agent, please do careful research to understand the fees associated with their services and understand that agents cannot guarantee admission to a school nor can they guarantee issuance of a student visa. Any agent who promises either of these things is not being completely honest with you. The Embassy and the U.S. Department of State do not endorse agents nor do we have oversight over their business dealings in foreign countries. We therefore encourage parents and students to carry out the proper due diligence, or research and verification, before entering into an agreement with an agent to make sure you receive the services that you pay for. Please also remember that you do not have to pay money to receive education advising support, EducationUSA provides this free of charge.”
Here are two relevant excerpts from a forthcoming article of mine about this issue:
The former (EducationUSA advising centers) are charged with the task of representing all of U.S. higher education not individual schools. As such, the service they provide is valuable but very basic; the amount of time advisers are able to spend with any one student or parent is necessarily limited.
As many in the field have observed, agents understand the local language and culture, and are in a position to establish long-term relationships. They come in all shapes and sizes, encompassing the good, the bad and the ugly. Referring to the latter two categories, Philip G. Altbach, director of the Center for International Higher Education at Boston College, noted a couple of years ago that “There are a lot of bottom feeders out there,” but admitted that “In a globalized world, where some people need a lot of guidance to get here, there may be a legitimate place for responsible middlemen.”
Categories: Commentary
Tags: education agents, educational advising
Comments: Be the first to comment