Archive for December 2009

Top 10 Education Issues for 2009

30/12/2009

The increase of university tuition to 240,000 dong a month and swine flu have been cited by Dan Tri newspaper as two of the most outstanding education issues of 2009.

1.  University tuition ceiling raised to 240,000 dong:  On August 21 the Prime Minister raised university tuitions from 180,000 dong to 240,000 dong per month. The tuition adjustment is part of the National Assembly’s Resolution on renovating education and training finances. Tuition hikes have brought new worries to students burdened with higher daily expenses, room rents and other study costs. Many question if higher tuitions mean higher quality in education.

2.  MOET drafts strategy for education development in 2009-2020:  The Ministry of Education and Training (MOET) announced plans for education development in 2009-2020, but it was not welcomed. Many believe that the ministry needs to devise a more scientific and feasible strategy. Experts have pointed out that the time frame is not realistic and planners did not consult prestigious scientists and teachers from universities or education institutes. The plan’s goals are termed both unnecessary and unfeasible.

3.  The future of multiple university entrance exams undecided:  MOET tried multiple times to end university entrance exams and organize a single test for both high schools and universities, but the public has not supported the measure.

4.  Many schools became hospitals to fight A/H1N1 flu:  On July 19, 2009, Ngo Thoi Nhiem High School in HCM City became the first school in Vietnam to serve as a hospital to fight swine flu. Other schools followed, becoming makeshift hospitals with physicians, ambulances and medical equipment.

5.  Schools try to renovate teaching and learning methods:  Many schools have sought to improve teaching and learning methods to replace older approaches that have been criticized as “out of date and ineffective.” Luong Dinh Cua Primary School in HCM City, for example, organised group-based classes to shift to student-centered teaching methods. The HCM City Education and Training Department supported these changes.

6.  Too many school fees frighten students’ parents:  Education inspection tours discovered that schools collected too many fees and burdening parents and students. One primary school in Hanoi, for example, had a long list of 23 fees, which included unreasonable items such as the “tree care fund.” MOET instructed local education departments to examine university fee collection and impose heavy punishments on schools that collect fees in excess of the levels stipulated by MOET.

7.  Many universities unable to meet basic requirements: In 2009, MOET discovered a lot of non-state universities that cannot meet requirements on land, permanent and visiting lecturers and curricula to organize classes. MOET also admitted its shortcomings in higher education management.

8.  School morality emerged as a burning problem:  People have demanded the reorganization of morality instruction for students, after many cases of students assaulting teachers after receiving low grades.

9.  Short skirts banned:  On October 5, 2009, MOET revised school uniform regulations to explicitly stipulate that students must wear skirts that reach knee-level. The requirement has not pleased many students, who believe that this regulation is too rigid.

10.  Vietnam boasts outstanding young doctors:  2009 is the year of success for many young Vietnamese doctors. Dr Bui The Duy, Dean of the Information Technology of the Hanoi University of Technology at Hanoi National University, was granted the title of associate professor on November 20, 2009, becoming the youngest associate professor at age 31.

Dr Nguyen Hoang Long, 26, has become the first Vietnamese lecturer at Oxford University.

Time Magazine announced its top ten list for 2009, which includes Professor Ngo Bao Chau’s solution of the “fundamental lemma.” VietNamNet/Dan tri

From VietNamNet Bridge, 21.12.09

Do Clothes Really Make the Man (or Woman)? Have Visa, Will Issue (Not!)

21/12/2009

An amusing yet revealing story about Doan Nguyen Duc, who is on track to become Vietnam’s first billionaire with a net worth of VND 12.22 trillion ($683.5 million) in current stock holdings.  An excerpt from a VietnamNet story about Mr. Duc and wealth acquisition in Vietnam:

Jeans and a T-shirt

In faded old blue jeans and a plain pull-over T-shirt, Duc does not look like a business magnate.

But the US Consulate in Ho Chi Minh City found out the hard way that looks can be deceiving.

According to former US Consul Robert Silberstein, Duc was denied a visa to the US four years ago after the visa officer had said “he looked more like a worker than a boss.”

Duc shouted at the officer who had rejected him: “I’m chairman of a premier football club! I own a giant corporation with thousands of workers and hundreds of million dollars in revenue per year! How can you reject me?”

Two days later, the consulate called him back and gave him a visa.

Since the adjusted refusal rate for B (business/tourist) visas was 42.3% last year, according to the U.S. State Department, I wonder how many how many other legitimate applicants are rejected on the basis of what they happen to be wearing on the all-important day of their visa interview?  How often do consular officers ”judge a book by its cover” rather than make a judgement based on the documents presented and the applicant’s answers? 

The adjusted refusal rate for all non-immigrant visas for the previous three years is as follow:

FY 2008:  38.8%; FY 2007:  36.3%; FY 2006:  40.9%

Speaking of visas, the US, unlike other governments, does not release the adjusted refusal rate for student visas, but reliable sources estimate it’s around 40% in Vietnam.  Of course, one of the reasons is misinformed applicants (usually, thanks to misinformed education agents) or, in the most egregious cases, the use of fraudulent supporting documents.  Another reason is the oft-cited “gut instinct” and lack of accountability of consular officers.   The UK and Australia rejection rates this year were 6.7% (!) and 15%, respectively.

According to information from the “NIV Workload by Category FY-2008,” there were 504,647 applications that year for a student (F1) visa to the US with 340,711 issued and 163,936 refused.  If my math is correct, that translates into a worldwide refusal rate of 32%.

A Visa and Immigration Policy for the Brain-Circulation Era – Adjusting To What Happened in the World While We Were Making Other Plans

16/12/2009

I’m pleased to see NAFSA:  Association of International Educators, the premier international education professional association in the US, issue this statement.  The recommended changes would bring an outdated policy into line with current realities and better enable the US to “compete” with Australia and the UK.   (Note:  This report gets an award for “longest subtitle of the year.” )

The excerpt below is one of my favorite (my italics):

Facilitating Access for International Students

Today’s students demand choice—and that is as true of international students as it is of Americans. Immigration policy needs to be flexible enough to permit international students to avail themselves of the myriad educational opportunities that exist in this country. Rationalizing the Intending Immigrant Criterion Under current immigration law, applicants for student (F) visas must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the reviewing consular officer that they intend to return home after their course of study—i.e., that they do not intend to immigrate to the United States. Failure to prove this inherently un-provable negative constitutes by far the most common reason for visa denial for international students. And yet of course, both the applicants and the consular officers know that international students will have the opportunity under other provisions of law to apply for change of status in order to remain in the United States after graduation—and U.S. companies actively recruit them to do so. The reality is that some applicants intend to avail themselves of this opportunity, some don’t, and many have no specific intention one way or the other. No public policy purpose is served by basing visa policy on the pretense that this is not so. The decision on whether or not students can become immigrants is best made when they actually apply for that status.

For more information, including a summary, press release and a copy of the full report, follow this link.

“An overseas education remains the dream for many students”

13/12/2009

VietNamNet Bridge – For many Vietnamese students, domestic universities are just a stepping stone to their ultimate goal –  a foreign university.  Link to article.

“Policies for Teachers and Educational Leaders in the Innovative Education Process”

10/12/2009

I spoke at an  international workshop today for teachers and educational leaders, sponsored by Vietnam National University’s University of Education.   Topic:  Creating Globally Competent Citizens in Cross-Cultural Perspective.  It was a variation on one of the themes of my co-authored book chapter (see previous posting) with a focus on global citizenship education – obstacles and opportunities.  A Vietnamese translation of the chapter is available. 

If you are interested in the topics of intercultural competence, global competence and global citizenship, how they intersect and how they relate to patriotism and nationalism, please let me know.

State Int’l Education Consortia: Strength in Unity

06/12/2009

A recent phenomenon in U.S. higher education has been the creation of state consortia as a cost-effective means of promoting a state’s colleges and universities overseas as well as raising the profile of that state. 

Aside from the many well-known intrinsic benefits of hosting international students, there is the economic justification.  The 671,616 international students in the U.S. contribute $17.8 billion to the U.S. economy through their expenditures on tuition and living expenses, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce.  New York, for example, has 74,934 international students who collectively contribute nearly $2 billion to the state’s economy.

State international education consortia are a classic example of “strength in numbers” and cooperation/collaboration being driven by, in some cases, draconian budget cuts.  Some have an explicit link with economic development initiatives (bravo!) and even cooperate with other states.  Study Illinois, for example, list the following goals: 

  • To increase the name recognition of Illinois and its educational institutions
  • To promote the state of Illinois as a study destination
  • To increase the number of international students accessing Illinois educational programs – in person, online and otherwise
  • To facilitate partnerships between Illinois and foreign schools
  • To foster communication between institutions
  • To capitalize upon the services and support of city, state and federal agencies

 Here is a list of active consortia with links to websites, some multilingual, that provide basic information about institutions of higher education and their states 

 While I admire the entrepreneurial spirit of counties and cities that attempt to promote higher education in their areas, it could become a tad overwhelming for international students looking for schools in a country as large as the U.S.  It’s enough that there are 50 states.  On the other hand, some cities and counties are more visionary and proactive than the states in which they’re located.   

Most states, including some that rank among the top five, could substantially increase the number of Vietnamese young people studying at their colleges and universities given the proper investment in marketing and promotion in Vietnam.  There is a long list of ideas and possibilities, depending upon breadth of vision, depth of commitment (short-, medium- or long-term) and level of funding.

World University Project

01/12/2009

From the project website, brought to my attention by a Vietnamese graduate of Cambridge University:  A UK-based charity established by international students at Cambridge and Oxford in 2007, the World University Project was founded to advance the understanding and development of higher education around the world.  We do this primarily in the following ways:

  • The University Lives Collection, which is creating a snapshot of higher education student experience in our times, using video contributions from students around the world.
  • The World University Documentary, a documentary website which follows the views and experiences of university students and teachers worldwide, especially those in emerging economies. This project is on hold while we focus on the University Lives Collection.
  • Charitable fundraising and strategic partnerships aimed at channeling resources and expertise toward higher education in the developing world.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 63 other followers